I find out what people need, and turn it into evidence teams can act on.

I’m Mustafa, a UX and User Researcher in Manchester. I use usability testing, user interviews, heuristic evaluation and accessibility reviews to understand how people really use digital products, and to show teams where and why they struggle.

How I research

  1. Plan

    Agree the research questions, the people we need to hear from and what success looks like.

  2. Observe

    Run usability tests, interviews and expert reviews to see what people actually do, not just what they say.

  3. Make sense of it

    Group observations into patterns and separate strong evidence from early signals.

  4. Share and act

    Turn findings into clear, prioritised recommendations, then test again to check they worked.

Back to research

Uber Green: making the greener ride easier to choose

Uber Green offers a lower-emission ride, but many riders don’t notice it or understand why it matters at the moment they book. I set out to understand why, and to test whether riders could find and explain it without being slowed down.

Project type
Self-directed (personal) project
My role
Sole UX researcher (I also built the prototype used for testing)
Methods
Competitor analysis, think-aloud usability testing
Tools
Figma (test prototype)
The redesigned journey: a highlighted Green option, a short confirmation message and a post-ride summary. Concept project, not affiliated with Uber.

The problem

Uber Green sits among several ride options that riders scan quickly, mostly for price and arrival time. If the green option doesn’t stand out, and its benefit isn’t obvious, most people simply pick what they always pick.

The brief I set myself was to increase the visibility and clarity of Uber Green without adding steps or cognitive load. The audience is everyday ride-hailing users on mobile, including price-conscious riders.

Research

I ran a competitor analysis of how Uber, Bolt and FREE NOW present their greener ride options. I also defined UX goals and success measures before designing, so testing could show whether riders could find the option and explain what it does.

What I compared across three ride-hailing apps
What I comparedWhy it matters
Where the green option appears in the listRiders scan quickly, so position affects whether it is seen at all.
How it is labelledA clear name and icon help riders recognise it at a glance.
Whether the benefit is explainedIf riders don’t know why it matters, they have no reason to choose it.

Riders make this decision in seconds. The benefit has to be understood at a glance, inside the flow they already use.

From insight to test prototype

To test the research findings with riders, I built a high-fidelity prototype in Figma. Each change responds to one insight, so testing could show whether it made a difference.

Highlight Green in the ride list

Insight: riders were missing the option, so I gave it a clear highlight and label where they already look, rather than adding a new screen.

Explain the benefit in a short confirmation

Insight: one short message at the moment of choosing tells riders what Green does, without asking them to read anything beforehand.

Show impact after the ride

Insight: a sustainability summary reinforces the choice and gives a reason to choose it again, without interrupting the booking.

1. Choose: Green stands out in the list.
2. Confirm: the benefit in one sentence.
3. Reflect: impact shown after the trip.

Testing and outcome

I ran think-aloud usability testing with four participants, who booked a ride while describing what they noticed and why they made each choice.

P1P2P3P4
  • Easier to findMost participants found the Green option quicker to identify.
  • Easier to understandAfter the confirmation and feedback screens, most could explain its environmental benefit.
  • Price still mattersSome still chose on price, showing that visibility alone is not enough to change behaviour.

What I learned and what’s next

This project showed me that making something visible and making it persuasive are two different problems. Riders could find Green, but price still won for some of them.

Four participants is a small group, so these results are early signals rather than proof. Next, I would:

  • Test clearer side-by-side cost and CO₂ comparisons.
  • Explore incentives for choosing the greener option.
  • Test with a larger and more diverse group of riders.
Back to research

Manchester Student City Guide: evaluating and improving a student website

A website to help students find study spots, food, things to do and useful places in Manchester. I evaluated how usable it was and used real feedback to make its content more relevant to students.

Project type
University project
My role
Usability evaluation and research (I also built the site)
Methods
Heuristic evaluation, think-aloud testing, peer review
Tools
WordPress, HTML, CSS, JavaScript

Visit the live website (opens in a new tab)

The guide is organised around what students look for most: study spots, food and drink, things to do and useful places.

The problem

Students arriving in Manchester, especially international students, need quick, trustworthy information about where to study, eat and spend time. A guide only helps if it is easy to navigate and feels written for them.

Usability evaluation

Before involving users, I reviewed the website against Nielsen’s ten usability heuristics to spot potential navigation and usability issues.

  1. Visibility of system status
  2. Match between system and the real world
  3. User control and freedom
  4. Consistency and standards
  5. Error prevention
  6. Recognition rather than recall
  7. Flexibility and efficiency of use
  8. Aesthetic and minimalist design
  9. Help users recognise, diagnose and recover from errors
  10. Help and documentation

Think-aloud testing and feedback

I observed a peer using the WordPress version of the site while they talked through what they were thinking, and gathered wider peer feedback on the content and design.

Some images and text felt generic. To be useful, the guide needed to feel specific to Manchester and to student life.

Acting on the findings

Each finding led to a focused, testable improvement:

  • Replaced two images with location-specific photos, so pages show the real places being described.
  • Rewrote a generic heading so it says clearly what the section offers.
  • Rewrote two paragraphs to be clearer and more relevant to students.
  • Added student-friendly food offers, because cost matters to this audience.
BeforeGeneric imagery and a vague heading.
Student food offers near campus
AfterReal, local imagery and a heading that says what the section offers.

What I learned and what’s next

Even a single think-aloud session uncovered problems I hadn’t noticed in my own review. It showed me how directly user feedback can shape content and design decisions.

Testing with one participant is a clear limitation. Next, I would test with more students, including international students, and check the site against accessibility guidelines such as WCAG.

Next case study

Uber Green

About me

Background

Hi, I’m Mustafa Hussain, an aspiring UX and User Researcher with a genuine interest in understanding people and how they use digital products. I enjoy exploring what users need, what they find difficult, and how small changes can make their experiences better.

I’m particularly interested in user interviews, usability testing and accessibility. I believe listening to people and understanding their experiences is an important part of creating products that are useful and easy to use.

I’m still growing my skills, and I’m excited to build on them through projects and collaboration. My goal is to use research to make digital experiences more thoughtful, inclusive and user-friendly.

Methods

  • Usability testingThink-aloud sessions to see where people struggle and why
  • Heuristic evaluationReviewing designs against Nielsen’s usability heuristics
  • Competitor analysisComparing how other products solve the same problem
  • User interviewsUnderstanding needs, habits and frustrations in people’s own words
  • Accessibility reviewChecking contrast, readability and inclusive content

Research tools

Prototyping & testing
FigmaInteractive prototypes for usability sessions
MazeUnmoderated tests and task success metrics
Surveys & recruitment
Google FormsScreeners and short questionnaires
Microsoft FormsStructured feedback and follow-ups
Synthesis & mapping
MiroAffinity mapping and journey maps
DovetailTagging interview notes and finding themes
Interviews & sessions
Microsoft Teams & ZoomRemote think-aloud sessions and interviews
Optimal WorkshopCard sorting and tree testing

What I value

Empathy, clear communication, attention to detail and being honest about what research does and doesn’t show.

Education

  • BSc (Hons) Web and User Experience DesignManchester Metropolitan University · Graduating June 2027
  • Pearson qualification in Software Engineering, grade DDMFutureSkills at MediaCityUK, Salford City College · 2021–22